<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch it live!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/12/watch-it-live/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/12/watch-it-live/</link>
	<description>Change the world...it starts with you and me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 03:48:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ching</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/12/watch-it-live/comment-page-1/#comment-5234</link>
		<dc:creator>ching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=108#comment-5234</guid>
		<description>oh i just found out, sorry and thanks anyway:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh i just found out, sorry and thanks anyway:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ching</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/12/watch-it-live/comment-page-1/#comment-5233</link>
		<dc:creator>ching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=108#comment-5233</guid>
		<description>Hi choongyong, 

I&#039;ve been wanting to attend Parliamentary debates but I don&#039;t exactly know where to start with! How do you know the schedules and topic of discussions, and are they always open to public?? Thanks a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi choongyong, </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been wanting to attend Parliamentary debates but I don&#8217;t exactly know where to start with! How do you know the schedules and topic of discussions, and are they always open to public?? Thanks a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: choongyong.koh</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/12/watch-it-live/comment-page-1/#comment-3828</link>
		<dc:creator>choongyong.koh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=108#comment-3828</guid>
		<description>@Teo LL: Please refer to my post Is the Hansard verbatim, or near-verbatim? (http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/24/is-the-hansard-verbatim-or-near-verbatim/).  It is up to you to believe whether I cooked up the incident, but please don&#039;t accuse me of being one who accuses a conspiracy - I merely blogged what I see.

If I am being asked to testify on what I saw that day, I am going to say the same thing - Mrs Lim Hwee Hua did not say the sentence the same way as what is written in the Hansard.

And last, my intent, as always been repeated, is to ask people to see for themselves.  Only by seeing for yourself will you believe that something like that has happened.  No amount of writing from me can convince people that this happened.  I am not sure if this intent is not honourable enough for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Teo LL: Please refer to my post Is the Hansard verbatim, or near-verbatim? (<a href="http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/24/is-the-hansard-verbatim-or-near-verbatim/" rel="nofollow">http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/24/is-the-hansard-verbatim-or-near-verbatim/</a>).  It is up to you to believe whether I cooked up the incident, but please don&#8217;t accuse me of being one who accuses a conspiracy &#8211; I merely blogged what I see.</p>
<p>If I am being asked to testify on what I saw that day, I am going to say the same thing &#8211; Mrs Lim Hwee Hua did not say the sentence the same way as what is written in the Hansard.</p>
<p>And last, my intent, as always been repeated, is to ask people to see for themselves.  Only by seeing for yourself will you believe that something like that has happened.  No amount of writing from me can convince people that this happened.  I am not sure if this intent is not honourable enough for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teo LL</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/12/watch-it-live/comment-page-1/#comment-3825</link>
		<dc:creator>Teo LL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=108#comment-3825</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s perfectly fine to criticise but one must do so fairly and honestly. From the Hansard extracts, it is quite clear that Lim Hwee Hua did not let slip a number unintended for publication, and hence the major media channels &#039;did not report&#039;, quite unlike the conspiracy that Choon Yong accused them of. Choon Yong obviously missed her reference to the Hansard and jumped to the wrong conclusion. A juicy account makes for interesting reading but can obviously sting with less than honourable intent. Walk your own talk - be as fair and honest as you want the Government to be.   

Also, mediators to blog should take out netizens who use &#039;bad&#039; language, its just too uncivilised. People who uses vulgar language are usually those who runs out of words in their limited vocabulary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s perfectly fine to criticise but one must do so fairly and honestly. From the Hansard extracts, it is quite clear that Lim Hwee Hua did not let slip a number unintended for publication, and hence the major media channels &#8216;did not report&#8217;, quite unlike the conspiracy that Choon Yong accused them of. Choon Yong obviously missed her reference to the Hansard and jumped to the wrong conclusion. A juicy account makes for interesting reading but can obviously sting with less than honourable intent. Walk your own talk &#8211; be as fair and honest as you want the Government to be.   </p>
<p>Also, mediators to blog should take out netizens who use &#8216;bad&#8217; language, its just too uncivilised. People who uses vulgar language are usually those who runs out of words in their limited vocabulary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayme</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/12/watch-it-live/comment-page-1/#comment-3824</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=108#comment-3824</guid>
		<description>Tracked Hansard for recording of exchange; doesn&#039;t look like Lim hwee Hua mentioned anything new about GIC&#039;s performance. Looks like the 41% refers to the world equity index.

Much ado abou nothing - she seems to be repeationg what she had said before. I suppose that&#039;s why she said &#039;it&#039;s in the Hansard&quot;. Let&#039;s wait for Mar 09 numbers for GIC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tracked Hansard for recording of exchange; doesn&#8217;t look like Lim hwee Hua mentioned anything new about GIC&#8217;s performance. Looks like the 41% refers to the world equity index.</p>
<p>Much ado abou nothing &#8211; she seems to be repeationg what she had said before. I suppose that&#8217;s why she said &#8216;it&#8217;s in the Hansard&#8221;. Let&#8217;s wait for Mar 09 numbers for GIC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Roundup: Week 08</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/12/watch-it-live/comment-page-1/#comment-3796</link>
		<dc:creator>The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Roundup: Week 08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=108#comment-3796</guid>
		<description>[...] Snapshots — 12 Feb 2009 - Sgpolitics: Parliamentary Snapshots — 13 Feb 2009 - choongyong.com: Watch it live! [Recommended] - Gerald Giam: Parliament reports: More bloggers needed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Snapshots — 12 Feb 2009 &#8211; Sgpolitics: Parliamentary Snapshots — 13 Feb 2009 &#8211; choongyong.com: Watch it live! [Recommended] &#8211; Gerald Giam: Parliament reports: More bloggers needed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lim5</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/12/watch-it-live/comment-page-1/#comment-3766</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lim5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=108#comment-3766</guid>
		<description>Singapore do not have any natural resources, thus, We are able to accumulate so much of money.  Why? 

Investing in local and then to oversea market more than 20 years ago.  Thanks to Temasek for doing a great job as they are able to &#039;spread&#039; their risks globally and mainly to the US.   

Unfortunately,  lately, the entire world got hit very badly and even Iceland went bankrupted due to the &#039;con&#039; jobs by those Fund and Trust Managers in the US.   Obviously,  everyone here just jump on the bandwaqgon and &#039;attacked&#039; Temasek for their failures and so on.  Yes, we lost 31% or 41% i.e. S$200 of 500 Billion.  

Question:   Did anyone jump on them in the past when Temasek was making a lot of money for the nation?   Of course, not. 

Singapore&#039;s top trading partner is the US and and Europe.   Investing in these 2 continents is necessary as they are our Top Trading partners especially, the US.     We had to show them that we are truly &#039;Trading Partners&#039; and not just a &#039;one night stand&#039; partner.   In time of crisis just early 2008,   many US banks were running into trouble and obviously,  they were &#039;good buy&#039; for Temasek and definately, to show our investment skills, we took up and supported them.  

Unfortunanately, most of them turned out to be &#039;bad&#039; and needed to be bailout by their government. 

A lot of suggestions were made in this forum and Temasek and government authorities should study them and learned from your mistakes.  

There is no &#039;quck fix&#039; to any investment and global recession is for all to suffer too. 

Keep your heads up, Singaporeans. 


    


Don&#039;t forget that without the US market,  we are not able to &#039;sell&#039; our services and products and who will buy from us and we making a lot of money for the nation.   We had to be grateful to the US for opening up their doors to us and 
&#039;ditching&#039; them now will be bad for us in the long run.   Are we an &#039;ally&#039; of th</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Singapore do not have any natural resources, thus, We are able to accumulate so much of money.  Why? </p>
<p>Investing in local and then to oversea market more than 20 years ago.  Thanks to Temasek for doing a great job as they are able to &#8216;spread&#8217; their risks globally and mainly to the US.   </p>
<p>Unfortunately,  lately, the entire world got hit very badly and even Iceland went bankrupted due to the &#8216;con&#8217; jobs by those Fund and Trust Managers in the US.   Obviously,  everyone here just jump on the bandwaqgon and &#8216;attacked&#8217; Temasek for their failures and so on.  Yes, we lost 31% or 41% i.e. S$200 of 500 Billion.  </p>
<p>Question:   Did anyone jump on them in the past when Temasek was making a lot of money for the nation?   Of course, not. </p>
<p>Singapore&#8217;s top trading partner is the US and and Europe.   Investing in these 2 continents is necessary as they are our Top Trading partners especially, the US.     We had to show them that we are truly &#8216;Trading Partners&#8217; and not just a &#8216;one night stand&#8217; partner.   In time of crisis just early 2008,   many US banks were running into trouble and obviously,  they were &#8216;good buy&#8217; for Temasek and definately, to show our investment skills, we took up and supported them.  </p>
<p>Unfortunanately, most of them turned out to be &#8216;bad&#8217; and needed to be bailout by their government. </p>
<p>A lot of suggestions were made in this forum and Temasek and government authorities should study them and learned from your mistakes.  </p>
<p>There is no &#8216;quck fix&#8217; to any investment and global recession is for all to suffer too. </p>
<p>Keep your heads up, Singaporeans. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget that without the US market,  we are not able to &#8216;sell&#8217; our services and products and who will buy from us and we making a lot of money for the nation.   We had to be grateful to the US for opening up their doors to us and<br />
&#8216;ditching&#8217; them now will be bad for us in the long run.   Are we an &#8216;ally&#8217; of th</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toolangpah</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/12/watch-it-live/comment-page-1/#comment-3764</link>
		<dc:creator>toolangpah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=108#comment-3764</guid>
		<description>Bloody bunch of clowns in Parliament. It is an eyewash, farce, charade, etc. 

SMS not knowing their jobs, Finance Mininster allowing big losses, more than 3 million pay President holding key, 19k MPs littering, etc.

Dont cry for me, Singapore. Someone should consider setting up PAPS Party this election which is coming soon. PAPS .. Party Against Profiteering from Singaporeans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloody bunch of clowns in Parliament. It is an eyewash, farce, charade, etc. </p>
<p>SMS not knowing their jobs, Finance Mininster allowing big losses, more than 3 million pay President holding key, 19k MPs littering, etc.</p>
<p>Dont cry for me, Singapore. Someone should consider setting up PAPS Party this election which is coming soon. PAPS .. Party Against Profiteering from Singaporeans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TANZZZZZ</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/12/watch-it-live/comment-page-1/#comment-3760</link>
		<dc:creator>TANZZZZZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=108#comment-3760</guid>
		<description>To Teo LL
Have you ever thought that Singapore&#039;s progress is maybe due more to its citizens rather than the government?

The probability that our success is due to the general hardworking post war generation is much higher than to the government over the last 10 years. Look at Hongkong, Taiwan and Korea. I think they have made as much progress if not more....and that is without the benefit of a PAP. Judging from your comments, I wonder if we have become a nation that needs leadership rather than one that creates leadership? There was a time I believe when we set the benchmark that others follow, today we follow the benchmark of others.

Anyway, I believe the general consensus is not so much about the non-effectiveness of our government but one where there seems to be a perception that our government should be more accountable for their actions. They have claimed when credit was due but when mistakes or damages occurs I sincerely hope they will be equally stringent on themselves.

Let&#039;s be more objective in our discussions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Teo LL<br />
Have you ever thought that Singapore&#8217;s progress is maybe due more to its citizens rather than the government?</p>
<p>The probability that our success is due to the general hardworking post war generation is much higher than to the government over the last 10 years. Look at Hongkong, Taiwan and Korea. I think they have made as much progress if not more&#8230;.and that is without the benefit of a PAP. Judging from your comments, I wonder if we have become a nation that needs leadership rather than one that creates leadership? There was a time I believe when we set the benchmark that others follow, today we follow the benchmark of others.</p>
<p>Anyway, I believe the general consensus is not so much about the non-effectiveness of our government but one where there seems to be a perception that our government should be more accountable for their actions. They have claimed when credit was due but when mistakes or damages occurs I sincerely hope they will be equally stringent on themselves.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be more objective in our discussions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bunkincedar</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/12/watch-it-live/comment-page-1/#comment-3753</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunkincedar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=108#comment-3753</guid>
		<description>Hey, it was a very nice read... continue to go to such meetings... because there are certain things that you can only see in person. 

Also by reporting them, it will inadvertently force them to do the most correct thing. 

Also it is fun psychoanalysis. 

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, it was a very nice read&#8230; continue to go to such meetings&#8230; because there are certain things that you can only see in person. </p>
<p>Also by reporting them, it will inadvertently force them to do the most correct thing. </p>
<p>Also it is fun psychoanalysis. </p>
<p> <img src='http://www.choongyong.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
