<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REACH cannot be reached</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/02/reach-cannot-be-reached/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/02/reach-cannot-be-reached/</link>
	<description>Change the world...it starts with you and me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: choongyong.koh</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/02/reach-cannot-be-reached/comment-page-1/#comment-3597</link>
		<dc:creator>choongyong.koh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=96#comment-3597</guid>
		<description>I tried the site out again with Chrome and Firefox again this morning.  In Chrome, without clearing cache, the speed is reasonable.  Once cache is cleared, it again takes ages.  In Firefox, cache or no cache is the same slow speed.  Maybe it is just me. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried the site out again with Chrome and Firefox again this morning.  In Chrome, without clearing cache, the speed is reasonable.  Once cache is cleared, it again takes ages.  In Firefox, cache or no cache is the same slow speed.  Maybe it is just me. <img src='http://www.choongyong.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuang Shyue Chou</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/02/reach-cannot-be-reached/comment-page-1/#comment-3589</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuang Shyue Chou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=96#comment-3589</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using the Google Chrome browser. I have no problems reaching the REACH website now and earlier this morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using the Google Chrome browser. I have no problems reaching the REACH website now and earlier this morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ng</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/02/reach-cannot-be-reached/comment-page-1/#comment-3587</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=96#comment-3587</guid>
		<description>I have tried, it seems fine. However, maybe they need better machines to run if all singaporean is going to flood into the site. 

Btw, your comment box doesn&#039;t work well with my IE6; the display overflow to the right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried, it seems fine. However, maybe they need better machines to run if all singaporean is going to flood into the site. </p>
<p>Btw, your comment box doesn&#8217;t work well with my IE6; the display overflow to the right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: choongyong.koh</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/02/reach-cannot-be-reached/comment-page-1/#comment-3583</link>
		<dc:creator>choongyong.koh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=96#comment-3583</guid>
		<description>@Wilfrid. After it gets cached the first time, it is slightly better.  Also, I think at different times the response is different. This morning I tried with Firefox again (since it is the only browser I have with a timing function) and clocked 943.074 seconds.

I guess REACH will really need to work on making the website response time fast enough for all if they truly want to be the main channel of e-engagement for the Government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Wilfrid. After it gets cached the first time, it is slightly better.  Also, I think at different times the response is different. This morning I tried with Firefox again (since it is the only browser I have with a timing function) and clocked 943.074 seconds.</p>
<p>I guess REACH will really need to work on making the website response time fast enough for all if they truly want to be the main channel of e-engagement for the Government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilfrid</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/02/reach-cannot-be-reached/comment-page-1/#comment-3576</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilfrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=96#comment-3576</guid>
		<description>Hmmm ... I use Google Chrome.  Loading time seems OK.  I haven&#039;t played around with the registration process yet ... lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm &#8230; I use Google Chrome.  Loading time seems OK.  I haven&#8217;t played around with the registration process yet &#8230; lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/02/reach-cannot-be-reached/comment-page-1/#comment-3575</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=96#comment-3575</guid>
		<description>REACH is too RICH to be REACHED. They only answer to million dollar ministers, not the people.

REACHIE RICH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REACH is too RICH to be REACHED. They only answer to million dollar ministers, not the people.</p>
<p>REACHIE RICH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T T Tan</title>
		<link>http://www.choongyong.com/2009/02/02/reach-cannot-be-reached/comment-page-1/#comment-3574</link>
		<dc:creator>T T Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choongyong.com/?p=96#comment-3574</guid>
		<description>I think they need more bandwidth..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they need more bandwidth..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

